You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-institutional review of characteristics and management of gunshot wounds to the spine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Spine Journal, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.04.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabrielle Santangelo, Connor Wathen, Thomas Pieters, Derek D George, Logan Worley, Dominick Macaluso, Mert Marcel Dagli, Sandra Catanzaro, Ben Gu, William C Welch, Dmitry Petrov, G Edward Vates, Ali K Ozturk, James Schuster, Jonathan J Stone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,059,190
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from Spine Journal
#937
of 3,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,751
of 173,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine Journal
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.