↓ Skip to main content

Private provision of public goods under price uncertainty: a comment

Overview of attention for article published in Social Choice and Welfare, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Private provision of public goods under price uncertainty: a comment
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare, May 2024
DOI 10.1007/s00355-024-01526-1
Authors

Etienne Billette de Villemeur, Sebastián Cea-Echenique, Conrado Cuevas

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,771,186
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#111
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,742
of 170,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them