You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building momentum through networks: Bioimaging across the Americas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Microscopy, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jmi.13318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana De Niz, Rodrigo Escobedo García, Celina Terán Ramirez, Ysa Pakowski, Yuriney Abonza, Nikki Bialy, Vanessa L. Orr, Andres Olivera, Victor Abonza, Karina Alleva, Silvana Allodi, Michael F. Almeida, Alexis Ricardo Becerril Cuevas, Frederic Bonnet, Armando Burgos Solorio, Teng‐Leong Chew, Gustavo Chiabrando, Beth Cimini, Aurélie Cleret‐Buhot, Gastón Contreras Jiménez, Laura Daza, Vanessa De Sá, Natalia De Val, Diego L. Delgado‐Álvarez, Kevin Eliceiri, Reto Fiolka, Hernan Grecco, Dorit Hanein, Paúl Hernández Herrera, Phil Hockberger, Haydee O. Hernandez, Yael Hernandez Guadarrama, Michelle Itano, Caron A. Jacobs, Luis F. Jiménez‐García, Vilma Jiménez Sabinina, Andres Kamaid, Antje Keppler, Abhishek Kumar, Judith Lacoste, Alenka Lovy, Kate Luby‐Phelps, Anita Mahadevan‐Jansen, Leonel Malacrida, Shalin B. Mehta, Caroline Miller, Kildare Miranda, Joshua A. Moore, Alison North, Peter O'Toole, Mariana Olivares Urbano, Lía I. Pietrasanta, Rodrigo V. Portugal, Andrés H. Rossi, Jonathan Sanchez Contreras, Caterina Strambio‐De‐Castilla, Gloria Soldevila, Bruno Vale, Diana Vazquez, Chris Wood, Claire M. Brown, Adan Guerrero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 59% |
| Scientists | 8 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 67% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 67% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,868,076
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microscopy
#32
of 1,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,246
of 165,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microscopy
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.