↓ Skip to main content

Double vitrification and warming of blastocysts does not affect IVF implantation rates, or birth outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive BioMedicine Online, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Double vitrification and warming of blastocysts does not affect IVF implantation rates, or birth outcomes
Published in
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, May 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104103
Authors

B Al Hashimi, E Linara-Demakakou, SC Harvey, KE Harvey, DK Griffin, K Ahuja, N Macklon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,426,837
of 25,981,448 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive BioMedicine Online
#882
of 2,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,373
of 232,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive BioMedicine Online
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,981,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.