↓ Skip to main content

Effect of magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes coupled with magnetic field on anaerobic digestion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Water Process Engineering, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes coupled with magnetic field on anaerobic digestion
Published in
Journal of Water Process Engineering, June 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105396
Authors

Fan Qin, Fengyuan Zhang, Mingyi Lu, Quan Feng, Rongbo Guo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,007,186
of 25,983,475 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Water Process Engineering
#253
of 628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,897
of 125,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Water Process Engineering
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,983,475 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 628 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.