↓ Skip to main content

Etiology of Severe Non-malaria Febrile Illness in Northern Tanzania: A Prospective Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
662 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Etiology of Severe Non-malaria Febrile Illness in Northern Tanzania: A Prospective Cohort Study
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002324
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The syndrome of fever is a commonly presenting complaint among persons seeking healthcare in low-resource areas, yet the public health community has not approached fever in a comprehensive manner. In many areas, malaria is over-diagnosed, and patients without malaria have poor outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 662 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 645 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 117 18%
Researcher 117 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 10%
Student > Postgraduate 42 6%
Other 38 6%
Other 115 17%
Unknown 166 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 168 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 46 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 31 5%
Other 91 14%
Unknown 185 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2025.
All research outputs
#1,196,478
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#622
of 10,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,338
of 237,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#11
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.