↓ Skip to main content

Development of Triphenylmethane Dyes for In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging of Aβ Oligomers

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Chemical Neuroscience, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of Triphenylmethane Dyes for In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging of Aβ Oligomers
Published in
ACS Chemical Neuroscience, May 2024
DOI 10.1021/acschemneuro.4c00053
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kotaro Nagashima, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Takahiro Akasaka, Masahiro Ono

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,979,515
of 25,936,091 outputs
Outputs from ACS Chemical Neuroscience
#965
of 2,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,706
of 161,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Chemical Neuroscience
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,936,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.