↓ Skip to main content

A practical guide to bioimaging research data management in core facilities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microscopy, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A practical guide to bioimaging research data management in core facilities
Published in
Journal of Microscopy, May 2024
DOI 10.1111/jmi.13317
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Schmidt, Tom Boissonnet, Julia Dohle, Karen Bernhardt, Elisa Ferrando‐May, Tobias Wernet, Roland Nitschke, Susanne Kunis, Stefanie Weidtkamp‐Peters

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,112,316
of 25,934,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microscopy
#1,194
of 1,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,322
of 160,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microscopy
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,923 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.