↓ Skip to main content

Quadriceps weakness predicts risk for knee joint space narrowing in women in the MOST cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quadriceps weakness predicts risk for knee joint space narrowing in women in the MOST cohort
Published in
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, February 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2010.02.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Quadriceps weakness has been reported with incident but not progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA) in longitudinal studies. This study examined the relationship between quadriceps strength and worsening of knee joint space narrowing (JSN) over 30 months.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 263 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 80 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Sports and Recreations 22 8%
Engineering 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 113 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2025.
All research outputs
#9,958,434
of 32,718,554 outputs
Outputs from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#1,647
of 3,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,591
of 226,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,718,554 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.