↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Frequency of Superior Vena Cava Obstruction in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients and Its Relation to Previous Superior Cavopulmonary Anastomosis
Published in
American Journal of Cardiology, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.029
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The risk factors for superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction after pediatric orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) have not been identified. This study tested the hypothesis that pretransplant superior cavopulmonary anastomosis (CPA) predisposes patients to SVC obstruction. A retrospective review of the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium registry from 1982 through 2007 was performed. Previous CPA, other cardiac surgeries, gender, age at transplantation, and weight at transplantation were assessed for the risk of developing SVC obstruction. Death, subsequent OHT, or reoperation involving the SVC were treated as competing risks. Of the 894 pediatric OHT patients identified, 3.1% (n = 28) developed SVC obstruction during median follow-up of 1.0 year (range: 0 to 19.5 years). Among patients who developed SVC obstruction, 32% (n = 9) had pretransplant CPA. SVC surgery before OHT was associated with posttransplant development of SVC obstruction (p <0.001) after adjustment for gender, age, and weight at OHT and year of OHT. Patients with previous CPA had increased risk for SVC obstruction compared with patients with no history of previous cardiac surgery (hazard ratio 10.6, 95% confidence interval: 3.5 to 31.7) and to patients with history of non-CPA cardiac surgery (hazard ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.8 to 12.5). In conclusion, previous CPA is a significant risk factor for the development of post-heart transplant SVC obstruction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 13%
Unknown 20 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 17%
Librarian 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 57%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2013.
All research outputs
#31,576,053
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Cardiology
#15,385
of 16,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,121
of 248,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Cardiology
#83
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.