↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism and timing of Mcm2–7 ring closure during DNA replication origin licensing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanism and timing of Mcm2–7 ring closure during DNA replication origin licensing
Published in
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/nsmb.3375
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The opening and closing of two ring-shaped Mcm2-7 DNA helicases is necessary to license eukaryotic origins of replication, although the mechanisms controlling these events are unclear. The origin-recognition complex (ORC), Cdc6 and Cdt1 facilitate this process by establishing a topological link between each Mcm2-7 hexamer and origin DNA. Using colocalization single-molecule spectroscopy and single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), we monitored ring opening and closing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mcm2-7 during origin licensing. The two Mcm2-7 rings were open during initial DNA association and closed sequentially, concomitant with the release of their associated Cdt1. We observed that ATP hydrolysis by Mcm2-7 was coupled to ring closure and Cdt1 release, and failure to load the first Mcm2-7 prevented recruitment of the second Mcm2-7. Our findings identify key mechanisms controlling the Mcm2-7 DNA-entry gate during origin licensing, and reveal that the two Mcm2-7 complexes are loaded via a coordinated series of events with implications for bidirectional replication initiation and quality control.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 33%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Professor 8 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 21%
Chemistry 5 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,596,855
of 29,905,648 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#2,279
of 3,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,852
of 442,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,905,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.