↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic Evolution of Conducting Nanofilament in Resistive Switching Memories

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Letters, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dynamic Evolution of Conducting Nanofilament in Resistive Switching Memories
Published in
Nano Letters, July 2013
DOI 10.1021/nl4015638
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Resistive random access memory (ReRAM) has been considered the most promising next-generation nonvolatile memory. In recent years, the switching behavior has been widely reported, and understanding the switching mechanism can improve the stability and scalability of devices. We designed an innovative sample structure for in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to observe the formation of conductive filaments in the Pt/ZnO/Pt structure in real time. The corresponding current-voltage measurements help us to understand the switching mechanism of ZnO film. In addition, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) have been used to identify the atomic structure and components of the filament/disrupted region, determining that the conducting paths are caused by the conglomeration of zinc atoms. The behavior of resistive switching is due to the migration of oxygen ions, leading to transformation between Zn-dominated ZnO(1-x) and ZnO.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 290 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 27%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 4%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 78 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 85 28%
Engineering 51 17%
Physics and Astronomy 37 12%
Chemistry 13 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 98 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,470,643
of 24,077,652 outputs
Outputs from Nano Letters
#5,870
of 13,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,300
of 201,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Letters
#100
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,077,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.