↓ Skip to main content

TCW: Transcriptome Computational Workbench

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TCW: Transcriptome Computational Workbench
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069401
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The analysis of transcriptome data involves many steps and various programs, along with organization of large amounts of data and results. Without a methodical approach for storage, analysis and query, the resulting ad hoc analysis can lead to human error, loss of data and results, inefficient use of time, and lack of verifiability, repeatability, and extensibility.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
Belgium 2 4%
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#11,164,534
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95,535
of 224,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,722
of 221,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,381
of 5,266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.