↓ Skip to main content

The slipstream strategy: How high-status OEMs coopete with platforms to maintain their digital extensions' edge

Overview of attention for article published in Research Policy, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The slipstream strategy: How high-status OEMs coopete with platforms to maintain their digital extensions' edge
Published in
Research Policy, September 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2024.105032
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Unspecified 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 34 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 13 22%
Unspecified 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 35 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,852,738
of 27,791,244 outputs
Outputs from Research Policy
#2,301
of 2,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,095
of 308,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Policy
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,791,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.