PD30-03 PREDICTING RESPONSE TO INTRAVESICAL BCG IN HIGH RISK NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER USING AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-POWERED PATHOLOGY ASSAY: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION IN AN INTERNATIONAL 12 CENTER COHORT
Yair Lotan, Viswesh Krishna, Bryn Launer, Vrishab Krishna, Siddhant Singhi, Jennifer Gordetsky, Jay B. Shah, Thomas Gerald, Eugene Shkolyar, Dickon Hayne, Andrew Redfern, Lisa Spalding, Courtney Stewart, Vikram Narayan, Dattatraya Patil, Vignesh T. Packiam, Anand Rajan, Michael A. O'Donnell, Loic Baekelandt, Mario I. Fernandez, Marcela Schultz, Patrick J. Hensley, Derek B. Allison, John A. Taylor, Ameer Hamza, Vivek Nimgaonkar, Ekin Tiu, Louis J. Vaickus, Snehal Sonawane, Daniel L. Miller, Damir Vrabac, Waleed M. Abuzeid, Anirudh Joshi, Sam S. Chang, Stephen B. Williams
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,993,216
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#3,009
of 17,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,415
of 240,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#38
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
