↓ Skip to main content

Viewing and making art together: a multi-session art-gallery-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers

Overview of attention for article published in Aging & Mental Health, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Viewing and making art together: a multi-session art-gallery-based intervention for people with dementia and their carers
Published in
Aging & Mental Health, July 2013
DOI 10.1080/13607863.2013.818101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul M. Camic, Victoria Tischler, Chantal Helen Pearman

Abstract

This is the first known study that sought to understand the experience of an eight-week art-gallery-based intervention offered at two distinctly different galleries for people with mild to moderate dementia and their carers. The study examined impact on social inclusion, carer burden, and quality of life and daily living activities for a person with dementia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 310 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 15%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 89 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 25%
Social Sciences 41 13%
Arts and Humanities 31 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 8%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 91 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,623,347
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Aging &amp; Mental Health
#476
of 2,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,783
of 242,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging &amp; Mental Health
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.