You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reorganization of vegetation, hydrology and soil carbon after permafrost degradation across heterogeneous boreal landscapes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035017 |
Authors |
M Torre Jorgenson, Jennifer Harden, Mikhail Kanevskiy, Jonathan O’Donnell, Kim Wickland, Stephanie Ewing, Kristen Manies, Qianlai Zhuang, Yuri Shur, Robert Striegl, Josh Koch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 21% |
Researcher | 48 | 19% |
Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
Professor | 11 | 4% |
Other | 40 | 16% |
Unknown | 43 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 72 | 28% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 62 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 13% |
Engineering | 11 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 7% |
Unknown | 55 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#5,714
of 6,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,176
of 210,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#54
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.