↓ Skip to main content

Taxes and Subsidies for Improving Diet and Population Health in Australia: A Cost-Effectiveness Modelling Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
115 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
reddit
5 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Taxes and Subsidies for Improving Diet and Population Health in Australia: A Cost-Effectiveness Modelling Study
Published in
PLOS Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 403 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 16%
Student > Bachelor 54 13%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 8%
Other 18 4%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 144 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 29 7%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Other 71 18%
Unknown 159 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 448. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#79,151
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#206
of 5,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,530
of 479,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#3
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.