↓ Skip to main content

Energy Efficiency of Conventional, Organic, and Alternative Cropping Systems for Food and Fuel at a Site in the U.S. Midwest

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Energy Efficiency of Conventional, Organic, and Alternative Cropping Systems for Food and Fuel at a Site in the U.S. Midwest
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, April 2010
DOI 10.1021/es903385g
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Italy 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 149 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 20%
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 30%
Environmental Science 32 20%
Engineering 15 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 27 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#9,465,028
of 27,631,845 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#10,373
of 22,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,425
of 112,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#69
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,631,845 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.