↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of the Iowa S-SCHIP Program on Access, Health Status, and the Family Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Ambulatory Pediatrics, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 149)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Impact of the Iowa S-SCHIP Program on Access, Health Status, and the Family Environment
Published in
Ambulatory Pediatrics, September 2003
DOI 10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0263:tiotis>2.0.co;2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the effect of the Iowa Separate State Child Health Insurance Program (S-SCHIP) on need for services, utilization and access to care, child health status, and the family environment. A longitudinal pretest-posttest panel survey was used to evaluate differences in children's access to health care, health status, and family environment at the beginning of the program and after 1 year. Written surveys with telephone follow-up calls were used to collect the data. Pre- and postquestionnaire results for 463 children were matched and compared using the McNemar test for correlated proportions and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Approximately 71% of families responded to both surveys. Similar rates of perceived need for each of 6 service areas were found after being in the program for a year as before. Unmet need was significantly reduced among those needing services: medical care (27% before, 6% after), specialty care (40% before, 13% after), dental care (30% before, 10% after), vision care (46% before, 12% after), behavioral and emotional care (42% before, 18% after), and prescription medications (21% before, 13% after). Overall health status was rated significantly better (ie, excellent: 37% before, 42% after). Ninety-five percent of families reported a reduction in family stress, and there was significantly less worry about the ability to pay for their child's health care (92% before, 57% after). The activities of fewer children were limited because of potential health care costs. The Iowa S-SCHIP program improved access to care and the family environment for children enrolled during the first year without a change in perceived need for services.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Psychology 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,087,335
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Ambulatory Pediatrics
#36
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,781
of 60,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambulatory Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them