↓ Skip to main content

Molecular characterization of birch toti-like virus, a plant-associated member of the new family Orthototiviridae

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular characterization of birch toti-like virus, a plant-associated member of the new family Orthototiviridae
Published in
Archives of Virology, June 2024
DOI 10.1007/s00705-024-06067-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A novel totivirus, named "birch toti-like virus" (BTLV), was discovered in European white birch (Betula pendula) plants. The genome of BTLV is 4,967 nucleotides long and contains two overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) coding for the capsid protein (CP) and an RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRP). The encoded CP and RdRP proteins shared 46.9% and 60.2% amino acid sequence identity, respectively, with those of Panax notoginseng virus B. The presence of a putative slippery heptamer signal 82 nt upstream of the stop codon of ORF1 suggests that a -1 translational frameshifting strategy is involved in the expression of ORF2, like in other totiviruses. Phylogenetic analysis based on the CP and RdRP amino acid sequences placed this virus within a clade of plant-associated totiviruses, with taro-associated virus as its closest relative. Hence, based on its distinct host and the amino acid sequence similarity between BTLV and its relatives, we conclude that birch toti-like virus is a new member of the genus Totivirus.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,825,542
of 26,107,266 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#2,997
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,607
of 155,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,107,266 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.