↓ Skip to main content

A Closer Look: Examining Teachers' Language Around UDL, Inclusive Classrooms, and Intellectual Disability

Overview of attention for article published in Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Closer Look: Examining Teachers' Language Around UDL, Inclusive Classrooms, and Intellectual Disability
Published in
Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, February 2017
DOI 10.1352/1934-9556-55.1.15
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the language teachers used to discuss inclusion, Universal Design for Learning (UDL), and learners with intellectual disability (ID) in an effort to better understand how teachers describe the relationship between those three. Utilizing a secondary analysis procedure, interview transcripts from seven general education teachers were reanalyzed to identify language used by teachers to refer to inclusive educational settings, the implementation of UDL, and learners with intellectual disability. The identified themes were then juxtaposed against the UDL framework (principles, guidelines, and checkpoints) and the current literature related to UDL and inclusive education. We end with recommendations for future practice and research involving inclusive classrooms, UDL, and learners with ID.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Professor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 40 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 29%
Psychology 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 43 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#27,705,249
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#284
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359,471
of 470,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.