↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Application of Residual Dipolar Couplings and Selective Quantitative NOE to Establish the Structures of Tetranortriterpenoids from Xylocarpus rumphii
Published in
Journal of Natural Products, January 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00906
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nine triterpenoid derivatives were isolated from the heartwood of Xylocarpus rumphii and were identified as xylorumphiins E (1), C (2), L (3), and M-R (4-9). Compounds 4-9 have a hemiacetal group in the triterpenoid side chain, making them impossible to purify. Purification was achieved after acetylation and subsequent separation of the epimeric mixtures of acetates; however differentiaition of the R and S epimers was not possible using standard NMR techniques. In one case, the relative configuration of a remotely located stereocenter with respect to the stereocenters in the main skeleton was unambiguously determined using residual dipolar couplings. Dipolar couplings were collected from the sample oriented in compressed poly(methyl methacrylate) gels swollen in CDCl3. In another case, the relative configuration was determined using 1D selective quantitative NOE experiments. Xylorumphiin K (10), xyloccensin E, taraxer-14-en-3β-ol, (22S)-hydroxytirucalla-7,24-diene-3,23-dione, and 25-hydroxy-(20S,24S)-epoxydammaran-3-one were isolated from the bark of the same plant. Compounds 3-10 are new compounds. Compounds 1-6 and xyloccensin E were tested at one concentration, 1 × 10(-5) M, in the NCI59 cell one-dose screen but did not show significant activity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,370,761
of 28,695,121 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Products
#788
of 5,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,584
of 432,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Products
#29
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,695,121 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.