↓ Skip to main content

Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY and OMI tropospheric NO2 columns: Observing the diurnal evolution of chemistry and emissions from space

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY and OMI tropospheric NO2 columns: Observing the diurnal evolution of chemistry and emissions from space
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, May 2008
DOI 10.1029/2007jd008816
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 114 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Professor 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 41 34%
Environmental Science 29 24%
Chemistry 7 6%
Engineering 6 5%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,093,442
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#2,390
of 16,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,869
of 137,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#28
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.