↓ Skip to main content

Dose–Response Relationship of Prenatal Mercury Exposure and IQ: An Integrative Analysis of Epidemiologic Data

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health Perspectives, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
10 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
6 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dose–Response Relationship of Prenatal Mercury Exposure and IQ: An Integrative Analysis of Epidemiologic Data
Published in
Environmental Health Perspectives, January 2007
DOI 10.1289/ehp.9303
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Prenatal exposure to mercury has been associated with adverse childhood neurologic outcomes in epidemiologic studies. Dose-response information for this relationship is useful for estimating benefits of reduced mercury exposure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 234 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 17%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Other 17 7%
Other 53 21%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 17%
Environmental Science 43 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 10%
Psychology 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 60 24%
Unknown 51 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2026.
All research outputs
#1,096,582
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health Perspectives
#1,015
of 10,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,707
of 232,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health Perspectives
#14
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.