↓ Skip to main content

Data quality assurance and control in cognitive research: Lessons learned from the PREDICT‐HD study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Data quality assurance and control in cognitive research: Lessons learned from the PREDICT‐HD study
Published in
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, February 2017
DOI 10.1002/mpr.1534
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We discuss the strategies employed in data quality control and quality assurance for the cognitive core of Neurobiological Predictors of Huntington's Disease (PREDICT-HD), a long-term observational study of over 1,000 participants with prodromal Huntington disease. In particular, we provide details regarding the training and continual evaluation of cognitive examiners, methods for error corrections, and strategies to minimize errors in the data. We present five important lessons learned to help other researchers avoid certain assumptions that could potentially lead to inaccuracies in their cognitive data.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Psychology 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Mathematics 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#25,003,463
of 27,788,362 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
#383
of 449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,616
of 326,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.