You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Visualizing fossilization using laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry maps of trace elements in Late Cretaceous bones
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geology, June 2009
|
DOI | 10.1130/g25551a.1 |
Authors |
Alan E. Koenig, Raymond R. Rogers, Clive N. Trueman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Norway | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Poland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
Researcher | 18 | 22% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Professor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 52% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2009.
All research outputs
#4,837,286
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#2,441
of 4,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,774
of 125,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.