↓ Skip to main content

Avoid non‐probability sampling to select population monitoring sites: Comment on McClure and Rolek (2023)

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Avoid non‐probability sampling to select population monitoring sites: Comment on McClure and Rolek (2023)
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, July 2024
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.14380
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 24%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#17,983,707
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#2,373
of 2,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,457
of 157,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#24
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.