↓ Skip to main content

The need to implement FAIR principles in biomolecular simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, April 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
44 X users
bluesky
45 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The need to implement FAIR principles in biomolecular simulations
Published in
Nature Methods, April 2025
DOI 10.1038/s41592-025-02635-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rommie E. Amaro, Johan Åqvist, Ivet Bahar, Federica Battistini, Adam Bellaiche, Daniel Beltran, Philip C. Biggin, Massimiliano Bonomi, Gregory R. Bowman, Richard A. Bryce, Giovanni Bussi, Paolo Carloni, David A. Case, Andrea Cavalli, Chia-En A. Chang, Thomas E. Cheatham, Margaret S. Cheung, Christophe Chipot, Lillian T. Chong, Preeti Choudhary, G. Andres Cisneros, Cecilia Clementi, Rosana Collepardo-Guevara, Peter Coveney, Roberto Covino, T. Daniel Crawford, Matteo Dal Peraro, Bert L. de Groot, Lucie Delemotte, Marco De Vivo, Jonathan W. Essex, Franca Fraternali, Jiali Gao, Josep Ll. Gelpí, Francesco L. Gervasio, Fernando D. González-Nilo, Helmut Grubmüller, Marina G. Guenza, Horacio V. Guzman, Sarah Harris, Teresa Head-Gordon, Rigoberto Hernandez, Adam Hospital, Niu Huang, Xuhui Huang, Gerhard Hummer, Javier Iglesias-Fernández, Jan H. Jensen, Shantenu Jha, Wanting Jiao, William L. Jorgensen, Shina C. L. Kamerlin, Syma Khalid, Charles Laughton, Michael Levitt, Vittorio Limongelli, Erik Lindahl, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Sharon Loverde, Magnus Lundborg, Yun L. Luo, F. Javier Luque, Charlotte I. Lynch, Alexander D. MacKerell, Alessandra Magistrato, Siewert J. Marrink, Hugh Martin, J. Andrew McCammon, Kenneth Merz, Vicent Moliner, Adrian J. Mulholland, Sohail Murad, Athi N. Naganathan, Shikha Nangia, Frank Noe, Agnes Noy, Julianna Oláh, Megan L. O’Mara, Mary Jo Ondrechen, Jose N. Onuchic, Alexey Onufriev, Sílvia Osuna, Giulia Palermo, Anna R. Panchenko, Sergio Pantano, Carol Parish, Michele Parrinello, Alberto Perez, Tomas Perez-Acle, Juan R. Perilla, B. Montgomery Pettitt, Adriana Pietropaolo, Jean-Philip Piquemal, Adolfo B. Poma, Matej Praprotnik, Maria J. Ramos, Pengyu Ren, Nathalie Reuter, Adrian Roitberg, Edina Rosta, Carme Rovira, Benoit Roux, Ursula Rothlisberger, Karissa Y. Sanbonmatsu, Tamar Schlick, Alexey K. Shaytan, Carlos Simmerling, Jeremy C. Smith, Yuji Sugita, Katarzyna Świderek, Makoto Taiji, Peng Tao, D. Peter Tieleman, Irina G. Tikhonova, Julian Tirado-Rives, Iñaki Tuñón, Marc W. van der Kamp, David van der Spoel, Sameer Velankar, Gregory A. Voth, Rebecca Wade, Ariel Warshel, Valerie Vaissier Welborn, Stacey D. Wetmore, Travis J. Wheeler, Chung F. Wong, Lee-Wei Yang, Martin Zacharias, Modesto Orozco

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 34 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 38 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2026.
All research outputs
#622,669
of 34,846,597 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#683
of 6,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,954
of 364,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#12
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,846,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.