↓ Skip to main content

IGF1R+ Dental Pulp Stem Cells Enhanced Neuroplasticity in Hypoxia-Ischemia Model

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
IGF1R+ Dental Pulp Stem Cells Enhanced Neuroplasticity in Hypoxia-Ischemia Model
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12035-016-0210-y
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Until now, the surface markers of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) had not been fully identified. Here, we found that the IGF1 receptor (IGF1R), regarded as a pluripotent marker of embryonic stem cells (ESCs), was also expressed in human dental pulp derived-mesenchymal stem cells (hDSCs), which displayed a potential for both self-renewal and multipotency. hDSC-secreted IGF1 interacted with IGF1R through an autocrine signaling pathway to maintain this self-renewal and proliferation potential. Stereotaxic implantation of immunosorted IGF1R(+) hDSCs in rats with neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (NHI) promoted neuroplasticity, improving the neurological outcome by increasing expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, which enhanced both neurogenesis and angiogenesis. In addition, treatment with IGF1R(+) hDSCs significantly modulated neurite regeneration and anti-inflammation in vivo in NHI rats and in vitro in primary cortical cultures under oxygen/glucose deprivation. Autocrine regulatory expression of IGF1R contributed to maintaining the self-renewal capacity of hDSCs. Furthermore, implantation of IGF1R(+) hDSCs increased neuroplasticity with neurite regeneration and immunomodulation in and the NHI rat model.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#10,874,564
of 34,778,077 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,290
of 5,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,726
of 455,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#55
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,778,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.