↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Implications and Longitudinal Alteration of Peripheral Blood Transcriptional Signals Indicative of Future Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clinical Implications and Longitudinal Alteration of Peripheral Blood Transcriptional Signals Indicative of Future Cardiac Allograft Rejection
Published in
Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation, March 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.healun.2007.11.578
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that a peripheral blood transcriptional profile using 11 distinct genes predicts onset of cardiac allograft rejection weeks to months prior to the actual event. In this analysis, we ascertained the performance of this transcriptional algorithm in a Bayesian representative population: 28 cardiac transplant recipients who progressed to moderate to severe rejection; 53 who progressed to mild rejection; and 46 who remained rejection-free. Furthermore, we characterized longitudinal alterations in the transcriptional gene expression profile before, during and after recovery from rejection. In this patient cohort, we found that a gene expression score (range 0 to 40) of <or =20 represents very low risk of rejection in the subsequent 12 weeks: 0 progressed to treatable (ISHLT Grade > or =3A) rejection; 16 of 53 (30%) from the intermediate group (those who progressed to ISHLT Grade 1B or 2) and 13 of 46 (28%) controls (who remained Grade 0 or 1A) had scores < or =20. A gene score of > or =30 was associated with progression to moderate to severe rejection in 58% of cases. These two extreme scores (< or =20 or > or =30) represented 44% of the cardiac transplant population within 6 months post-transplant. In addition, longitudinal gene expression analysis demonstrated that baseline scores were significantly higher for those who went on to reject, remained high during an episode of rejection, and dropped post-treatment for rejection (p < 0.01). The use of gene expression profiling early after transplantation allows for separation into low-, intermediate- or high-risk categories for future rejection, permitting development of discrete surveillance strategies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Netherlands 1 7%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#12,425,654
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation
#2,172
of 4,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,791
of 136,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.