↓ Skip to main content

Calfed: An Experiment in Science and Decisionmaking

Overview of attention for article published in Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calfed: An Experiment in Science and Decisionmaking
Published in
Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, January 2003
DOI 10.1080/00139150309604521
Authors

Katharine L. Jacobs, Samuel N. Luoma, Kim A. Taylor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 50%
Student > Postgraduate 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Other 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,648,703
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
#176
of 422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,947
of 137,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them