↓ Skip to main content

Active School Playgrounds—Myth or Reality? Results of the “Move It Groove It” Project

Overview of attention for article published in Preventive Medicine, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Active School Playgrounds—Myth or Reality? Results of the “Move It Groove It” Project
Published in
Preventive Medicine, November 2001
DOI 10.1006/pmed.2001.0905
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

School playgrounds during break times provide potential opportunities for children to be active during the school day. However, there is limited research on how active children really are during these breaks. The CAST (Children's Activity Scanning Tool) instrument was developed, validated, and used to assess the percentages of children engaged in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and vigorous physical activity (VPA-a subset of MVPA) in 18 primary schools (children ages 5-12) in rural Australia. Related environmental factors were also measured. For a school of median size (200 students), 51.4% of boys and 41.6% of girls were engaged in MVPA while 14.7% of boys and 9.4% of girls were engaged in VPA. Levels of engagement in MVPA and VPA were significantly higher during lunch periods than during recess. MVPA and VPA engagement in smaller schools was significantly higher than in larger schools. With growing concern about children's physical activity (PA), school playgrounds offer an opportunity to increase children's MVPA engagement especially among girls. Consideration may be given to the lengthening of recess periods in order to increase PA levels. More research is needed to investigate factors affecting PA levels in larger schools.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 140 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 28 19%
Social Sciences 24 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Psychology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,572,882
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#1,075
of 5,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,654
of 51,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.