↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed‐Methods Study of Engineering Designers' Use of Language

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Engineering Education, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed‐Methods Study of Engineering Designers' Use of Language
Published in
Journal of Engineering Education, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00981.x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 5%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 204 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 29%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 10%
Professor 17 8%
Researcher 15 7%
Other 44 20%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 81 37%
Social Sciences 55 25%
Design 17 8%
Computer Science 13 6%
Arts and Humanities 7 3%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 35 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#9,344,464
of 27,254,928 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Engineering Education
#153
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,909
of 297,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Engineering Education
#34
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,254,928 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.