You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caffeine and Pharmaceuticals as Indicators of Waste Water Contamination in Wells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ground Water, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01118.x |
| Authors |
Ralph L. Seiler, Steven D. Zaugg, James M. Thomas, Darcy L. Howcroft |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 38 | 22% |
| Engineering | 26 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,855,465
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#62
of 899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,624
of 68,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#5
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.