↓ Skip to main content

Novel configurations of type I and II CRISPR–Cas systems in Corynebacterium diphtheriae

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Novel configurations of type I and II CRISPR–Cas systems in Corynebacterium diphtheriae
Published in
Microbiology, October 2013
DOI 10.1099/mic.0.070235-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vartul Sangal, Peter C. Fineran, Paul A. Hoskisson

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) are major barriers to recombination through recognition of invading nucleic acids, such as phage and plasmids, and promoting their degredation through the action of CRISPR associated (Cas) proteins. The genomic comparison of 17 Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains led to the identification of three novel CRISPR-Cas system variants, based on the Type II (Type II-C) or type I-E systems. The type II-C system was the most common (11/17 isolates) but it lacked the csn2 and cas4 genes that are involved in spacer acquisition. We also identified that this variant type II-C CRISPR-Cas system is present in other bacteria, and the first system was recently characterized in Neisseria meningitidis. In the remaining isolates, the type II-C system was replaced by a variant of type I-E (I-E-a), where the repeat arrays are inserted between the cas3 and cse1 genes. Three isolates with the type II-C system also possess an additional variant of type I-E (I-E-b), elsewhere in the genome, that exhibits a novel divergent gene organization within the cas operon. The nucleotide sequences of the palindromic repeats and the cas1 gene were phylogenetically incongruent to the core genome. The G+C content of the systems is lower (46.0-49.5 mol%) than the overall DNA G+C content (53 mol%), and they are flanked by mobile genetic elements, providing evidence that they were acquired in three independent horizontal gene transfer events. The majority of spacers lack identity with known phage or plasmid sequences, indicating that there is an unexplored reservoir of corynebacteriophages and plasmids. These novel CRISPR-Cas systems may represent a unique mechanism for spacer acquisitions and defence against invading DNA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,357,065
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Microbiology
#314
of 5,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,025
of 251,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiology
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.