Screening pedigrees for inherited minisatellite length changes provides an efficient means of monitoring repeat DNA instability but has given rise to apparently contradictory results regarding the effects of radiation on the human germline. To explore this further in individuals with known radiation doses and to potentially gain information on the timing of mutation induction, we have used an extremely sensitive single molecule approach to quantify the frequencies of mutation at the hypervariable minisatellites B6.7 and CEB1 in the sperm of three seminoma patients following hemipelvic radiotherapy. Scattered radiation doses to the testicles were monitored and pre-treatment sperm DNA was compared with sperm derived from irradiated pre-meiotic, meiotic and post-meiotic cells. We show no evidence for mutation induction in any of the patients and discuss this finding in the context of previous population studies using minisatellites as reporter systems, one of which provided evidence for radiation-induced germline mutation.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,087,116
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
#677
of 3,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,895
of 42,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
