↓ Skip to main content

Digitally enhanced thin layer chromatography: further development and some applications in isotopic chemistry

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Digitally enhanced thin layer chromatography: further development and some applications in isotopic chemistry
Published in
Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/jlcr.3052
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Improvements to thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis can be made easily and cheaply by the application of digital colour photography and image analysis. The combined technique, digitally enhanced TLC (DE-TLC), is applicable to the accurate quantification of analytes in mixtures, to reaction monitoring and to other typical uses of TLC. Examples are given of the application of digitally enhanced TLC to: the deuteromethylations of theophylline to [methyl-(2)H3]caffeine and of umbelliferone to [(2)H3]7-methoxycoumarin; the selection of tertiary amine bases in deuterodechlorination reactions; stoichiometry optimisation in the borodeuteride reduction of quinizarin (1,4-dihydroxyanthraquinone) and to the assessment of xanthophyll yields in Lepidium sativum seedlings grown in deuterated media.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Chemistry 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,387
of 24,590,593 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals
#980
of 1,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,006
of 203,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,590,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.