↓ Skip to main content

Behind Closed Doors: Preferential Disclosure in Private Meetings

Overview of attention for article published in SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Behind Closed Doors: Preferential Disclosure in Private Meetings
Published in
SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2024
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3914167
Authors

Hamilton Scott Asay, Shana Clor-Proell, Michael Thomas Durney

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,575,245
of 34,174,318 outputs
Outputs from SSRN Electronic Journal
#15,534
of 76,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,899
of 441,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SSRN Electronic Journal
#436
of 2,890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,174,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.