↓ Skip to main content

Orchestrated Intron Retention Regulates Normal Granulocyte Differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
14 X users
patent
19 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
495 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Orchestrated Intron Retention Regulates Normal Granulocyte Differentiation
Published in
Cell, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.052
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Intron retention (IR) is widely recognized as a consequence of mis-splicing that leads to failed excision of intronic sequences from pre-messenger RNAs. Our bioinformatic analyses of transcriptomic and proteomic data of normal white blood cell differentiation reveal IR as a physiological mechanism of gene expression control. IR regulates the expression of 86 functionally related genes, including those that determine the nuclear shape that is unique to granulocytes. Retention of introns in specific genes is associated with downregulation of splicing factors and higher GC content. IR, conserved between human and mouse, led to reduced mRNA and protein levels by triggering the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway. In contrast to the prevalent view that NMD is limited to mRNAs encoding aberrant proteins, our data establish that IR coupled with NMD is a conserved mechanism in normal granulopoiesis. Physiological IR may provide an energetically favorable level of dynamic gene expression control prior to sustained gene translation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Spain 4 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 469 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 26%
Researcher 107 22%
Student > Master 46 9%
Student > Bachelor 29 6%
Professor 23 5%
Other 73 15%
Unknown 87 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 178 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 132 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 4%
Computer Science 10 2%
Other 39 8%
Unknown 86 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2026.
All research outputs
#586,525
of 29,498,312 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#2,887
of 18,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,846
of 218,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#19
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,498,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.