↓ Skip to main content

Excited State N−H Tautomer Selectivity in the Singlet Energy Transfer of a Zinc(II)‐Porphyrin–Truxene–Corrole Assembly

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Excited State N−H Tautomer Selectivity in the Singlet Energy Transfer of a Zinc(II)‐Porphyrin–Truxene–Corrole Assembly
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, February 2017
DOI 10.1002/chem.201605909
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

An original corrole-containing polyad for S1 energy transfer in which one zinc(II)porphyrin donor is linked to two free base corrole acceptors by a truxene linker, is reported. This polyad exhibits a rapid zinc(II)porphyrin* → free base corrole transfer (4.83 x 1010 s-1; 298 K), even faster than the tautomerization in the excited state processes taking advantage of the good electronic communication provided by the truxene bridge. Importantly, the energy transfer process is selective by ~3 folds for one corrole N-H tautomer over the other even at low temperature (77 K). This selectivity is due to the difference in the J-integral being effective in both the Förster and Dexter mechanisms. The data are rationalized by DFT computations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 67%
Materials Science 2 17%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#11,552,475
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#9,529
of 29,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,815
of 353,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#154
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.