↓ Skip to main content

2-Amino-5-(1-methyl-5-nitro-2-imidazolyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole: A New Antimicrobial Agent

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 1968
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
2-Amino-5-(1-methyl-5-nitro-2-imidazolyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole: A New Antimicrobial Agent
Published in
Science, December 1968
DOI 10.1126/science.162.3858.1146-a
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Inspecting a pattern of alternating dark and light bars makes it difficult to see a similar pattern presented afterward. This phenomenon can be used to isolate mechanisms responsive to bars of a given width. Our results suggest that the human visual system contains several different classes of size detectors, each maximally sensitive to visual targets with sizes in a particular range.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Researcher 12 24%
Professor 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1986.
All research outputs
#8,859,166
of 26,265,706 outputs
Outputs from Science
#52,405
of 83,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,473
of 13,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#24
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,265,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.