↓ Skip to main content

Research Priorities for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Long View.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
bluesky
6 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Research Priorities for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Long View.
Published in
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, August 2024
DOI 10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia McCabe, Molly Beiting, Elaine R Hitchcock, Edwin Maas, Amy Meredith, Angela T Morgan, Nancy L Potter, Jonathan L Preston, Laura Moorer, Pooja Aggarwal, Kirrie Ballard, Laura Baskall Smith, Nicole F Caballero, Kathryn Cabbage, Julie Case, Susan Caspari, Karen V Chenausky, Shina Cook, Ewa Grzelak, Maryane Gomez, Aubrie Hagopian, Chantelle Highman, Anne Hodits, Jenya Iuzzini-Seigel, Jillian LeVos-Carlson, Barbara A Lewis, Patricia Mayro, Jyutika Mehta, Gabrielle Miller, Kimberly D Mory, Elizabeth Murray, Megan S Overby, Lucia Pasquel-Lefebvre, Derrick Peavy, Caitlin V Raaz, Brooke Rea, Denise Santos Ford, Lynn Smith, Michelle T Swartz, Melissa Taberski, Hayo Terband, Donna C Thomas, Hannah Valentine, Mirjam van Tellingen, Shelley Velleman, Emily Wang, Sarah White, Eddy C H Wong, Maria I Grigos

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Unknown 25 78%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 25 78%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2025.
All research outputs
#3,227,824
of 34,518,599 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
#377
of 4,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,016
of 336,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
#4
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.