↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive Self-Regulation of Unattainable Goals: Goal Disengagement, Goal Reengagement, and Subjective Well-Being

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
848 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adaptive Self-Regulation of Unattainable Goals: Goal Disengagement, Goal Reengagement, and Subjective Well-Being
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, December 2003
DOI 10.1177/0146167203256921
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Three studies examined associations between goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. In Study 1, 115 undergraduates reported on the extent to which they were able to abandon unattainable goals and reengage their efforts in alternative goals. Study 2 examined the importance of goal disengagement and goal reengagement in groups of young adults and older adults (N = 120). In Study 3, a sample of parents of children with cancer and parents of medically healthy children was examined (N = 45). The findings confirmed that goal disengagement and goal reengagement can be associated with ratings of high subjective well-being. In addition, the results showed that goal disengagement and goal reengagement can have interactive effects on subjective well-being. The importance of the findings for effective self-regulation and successful development are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 848 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Hong Kong 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 815 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 172 20%
Student > Master 99 12%
Student > Bachelor 90 11%
Researcher 72 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 63 7%
Other 171 20%
Unknown 181 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 409 48%
Social Sciences 66 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 57 7%
Unspecified 15 2%
Sports and Recreations 12 1%
Other 78 9%
Unknown 211 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2026.
All research outputs
#203,179
of 34,590,055 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#134
of 3,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225
of 199,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,590,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.