↓ Skip to main content

Current Management of Middle Cerebral Artery AneurysmsSurgical Results With a “Clip First” Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Neurosurgery, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Current Management of Middle Cerebral Artery AneurysmsSurgical Results With a “Clip First” Policy
Published in
Neurosurgery, March 2013
DOI 10.1227/neu.0b013e3182804aa2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

One response to randomized trials like the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial has been to adopt a "coil first" policy, whereby all aneurysms be considered for coiling, reserving surgery for unfavorable aneurysms or failed attempts. Surgical results with middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms have been excellent, raising debate about the respective roles of surgical and endovascular therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 30 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 50%
Neuroscience 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,414,665
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgery
#636
of 5,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,447
of 206,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgery
#7
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.