↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Safety and efficacy of B cell maturation antigen‐directed CAR T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and concurrent light chain amyloidosis
Published in
European Journal of Haematology, August 2024
DOI 10.1111/ejh.14293
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Clinical trials evaluating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have typically excluded patients with AL amyloidosis. As a result, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in this patient population. We retrospectively reviewed eight consecutive patients with RRMM and AL amyloidosis who were treated with standard of care CAR T-cell therapy. Cytokine release syndrome was seen in 75% of patients (grade ≥3: 0%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (grade 1) in only one patient. Low-grade cytopenias were common (any grade/grade ≥3: neutropenia 62.5%/37.5%, anemia 37.5%/0%, thrombocytopenia 25%/0%). CAR T-cell therapy led to rapid and deep responses with a median time to best response of 43 days and a hematologic very good partial response or better rate of 62.5%. Overall, we found that commercial CAR T-cell therapy was feasible, and effective in patients with RRMM and concurrent AL amyloidosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2025.
All research outputs
#2,838,765
of 32,776,013 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Haematology
#81
of 2,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,098
of 325,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Haematology
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,776,013 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.