↓ Skip to main content

Developing a range-wide sampling framework for endangered species: a case study with light-footed Ridgway’s rail

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Developing a range-wide sampling framework for endangered species: a case study with light-footed Ridgway’s rail
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2024
DOI 10.1007/s10531-024-02919-5
Authors

Bryan S. Stevens, Courtney J. Conway, Kimberly A. Sawyer, Lauren Kershek, Giselle Block, Sandra Hamilton, Rebecca Kolstrom

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,854,181
of 26,552,141 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2,434
of 2,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,003
of 135,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.