↓ Skip to main content

What does the history of Theraphosidae systematics tell us about the future of tarantula taxonomy?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Arachnid Science, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What does the history of Theraphosidae systematics tell us about the future of tarantula taxonomy?
Published in
Frontiers in Arachnid Science, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/frchs.2024.1445731
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2024.
All research outputs
#16,262,180
of 27,643,479 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Arachnid Science
#13
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,916
of 305,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Arachnid Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,643,479 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.