↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness and estimated costs of the Access to Baby and Child Dentistry program in Washington state

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effectiveness and estimated costs of the Access to Baby and Child Dentistry program in Washington state
Published in
Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), September 2005
DOI 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0341
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The authors estimated the effectiveness of the Access to Baby and Child Dentistry (ABCD) program as a tool to improve the oral health of children, and they measured its costs. ABCD is an effort to increase the utilization of dental care by Medicaid-enrolled children younger than 6 years. The authors compared the oral health of third-grade children in Spokane County Wash. (ABCD) with that of children in Pierce County (non-ABCD). They then compared the expenditures of ABCD with those associated with alternative dental care interventions. Children in Spokane County had better oral health than did the children in Pierce County. The authors also found that the ABCD program increased mean dental care costs by $8.17 per user over costs in Pierce County, and the program cost a mean of $5.33 per user in outreach and dentist and staff training costs. This study found that ABCD improved the oral health of all third graders, including those not eligible or enrolled in the program. Increased expenditures were attributable mainly to outreach and training costs. Programs such as ABCD, carried out collaboratively by component societies, health districts, dental schools and Medicaid, have the potential to increase access to care and improve health.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 47%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,503,471
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#372
of 3,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,299
of 100,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them