↓ Skip to main content

Sacred forests as repositories of local biodiversity in Africa: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Science and Technology, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sacred forests as repositories of local biodiversity in Africa: A systematic review
Published in
Forest Science and Technology, August 2024
DOI 10.1080/21580103.2024.2397522
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 23 64%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 11%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 23 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2026.
All research outputs
#953,660
of 32,617,562 outputs
Outputs from Forest Science and Technology
#1
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,790
of 322,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Science and Technology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,617,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them